<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audi Might be Keeping the 4.2-liter V8 After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/</link>
	<description>We Love Audi...A Little Too Much</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter soro</title>
		<link>http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>peter soro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audisite.com/?p=926#comment-269</guid>
		<description>absolutely I can agree no more with the audio arguement in favour of V8.  Its so sweet, pleasing and yet powerful at times howls impress all who ever tried the two engine forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely I can agree no more with the audio arguement in favour of V8.  Its so sweet, pleasing and yet powerful at times howls impress all who ever tried the two engine forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/20 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 346/351 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via audisite.gearheadmedia.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.audisite.com @ 2012-02-09 00:22:45 -->
