<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Audi Might be Keeping the 4.2-liter V8 After All</title> <atom:link href="http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/</link> <description>We Love Audi...A Little Too Much</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:59:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: peter soro</title><link>http://www.audisite.com/926/audi-keeping-v8-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link> <dc:creator>peter soro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:00:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audisite.com/?p=926#comment-269</guid> <description>absolutely I can agree no more with the audio arguement in favour of V8.  Its so sweet, pleasing and yet powerful at times howls impress all who ever tried the two engine forms.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely I can agree no more with the audio arguement in favour of V8.  Its so sweet, pleasing and yet powerful at times howls impress all who ever tried the two engine forms.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Object Caching 378/392 objects using disk

Served from: www.audisite.com @ 2010-09-09 04:56:37 -->